tools/rebuild_pages.sh rebuilds the site within 5 minutes of a change; by hand: python3 -B tools/site.py.1RB1RF_1LC1RE_---0LD_1LE0LD_1RA0RF_0RE0LB
Upstream result
Claimed elsewhere
The blank-start machine never halts: BECv10.v.TM33 ↗. Recorded commit time: 2026-10-13T13:42:06Z. First public push time is not established.
Absent from the current 663 holdout list. Earlier local observations remain below.

About this picture
The standard picture (bbchallenge.org's Default view): each row is the whole tape at one step, time runs downward, and the head's path draws the pattern.
Overview
In one sentence
Left pair (110)^a 0 (011)^n trades 1 block/trip; right binary counter +1 per 2 trips; reset at n<=2 grows L
- Upstream
- The blank-start machine never halts: BECv10.v.TM33 ↗. Recorded commit time: 2026-10-13T13:42:06Z. First public push time is not established.
- Status
- Externally Solveddeepen2 · updated 2026-10-10Parked · Deepen 2: re-alignment transient solved exactly (PROC rule, 11,500/11,500), and the phase-level closed-form orbit (exact against the trip-level orbit at 4,871/4,871 resets to 2.4e7 trips) runs to L = 6.9e7 with no race lost. The 3 open questions are optional.idle since Oct 10 06:29 · status.json 2026-10-10
- Class
- Bell eats counterours: Bell eats counter (sheet) · ours adds: unary left pair + binary right counter; reset absorbs counter digits · med confidence
- On the list
- not on
BB6_holdouts_663.txt(line 486 of the previous list) · historical 740 line 486
Mechanism
How it works: 3 notes
- Tape = 0^inf (110)^a 0 (011)^n, then a binary counter Q at the right end (3-cell digits, LSB nearest the head).
- One trip = zig-zag from the right end to the a|n boundary and back: a+1, n-1. Q gets +1 every 2nd trip.
- At n = 1 or 2: reset (two full sweeps), a restarts at 2 and L = a+n grows. Trips ignore Q; the reset ignores a.
Figures for Checkpoint A
One row per trip. Black dots mark the a|n boundary; the counter sits at the right edge.
Every 2 steps around the reset: compare the sweeps at the top with those below them.
One row per trip to 1M steps; each long diagonal is one phase. Compare the phases with each other.
More figures (2)Fig 4–5: Blaze view, 10 million steps · bbchallenge Default view, first 10,000 steps
Smooth, slow growth (span ~ t^0.35) with no chaotic patches.
For orientation: early zig-zag trips as bbchallenge.org shows them.
Rules (4/4 validated)exact tape rewrites the proof will formalize, each re-checked by simulation
| rule | from ⟶ to | cases | steps | checked |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| T: trip pair (clean counter) | 0∞ (110)2c 0 (011)n+3 <C 1010010 D(c) 0∞ ⟶ 0∞ (110)2c+2 0 (011)n+1 <C 1010010 D(c+1) 0∞ | c>=1, n>=0; D(c) = c LSB-first, digit 1=001, 0=000; fails for n+3<3 (reset) | 16n + 6*nu(c) + 62, nu = trailing 1-bits of c (exact fit) | ✓131/131 |
| T': trip pair, any natural counter word | 0∞ (110)a 0 (011)n+3 <C Q 0∞ ⟶ 0∞ (110)a+2 0 (011)n+1 <C inc(Q) 0∞ | Q, inc(Q) = 15 consecutive natural pairs at 3e8/6e8/9e8; a, n random | 16n + K(Q) | ✓60/60 |
| R: reset (clean counter) | 0∞ (110)2c 0 (011)n <C 1010010 D(c) 0∞, n in {1,2} ⟶ 0∞ (110)2 0 (011)2c+n+dL-2 <C Q' 0∞ | dL=1 if n=2; n=1: dL=4 (c even), 5 (c=3 mod 4), 6+nu(c>>2) (c=1 mod 4) | about 16L (not fitted) | ✓48/48 |
| R': reset ignores a | 0∞ (110)a 0 (011)n <C Q 0∞, natural (n,Q) at a reset, a replaced ⟶ 0∞ (110)2 0 (011)a+n+dL-2 <C Q' 0∞, same dL and Q' for every a | natural resets after 3e8 and 6e8 (both n=2); 6 values of a each (incl. 0, 2, 4, large) | — | ✓12/12 |
Compressed historythe tape as 0∞ (110)a 0 (011)n 1 W B> 0∞ at 37 moments: where the rules are read off
| step | a | n | L=a+n | W (x=110, y=111, |=00) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 152,677 | 1 | 82 | 83 | x3 |
| 154,006 | 3 | 80 | 83 | xxyx |
| 156,571 | 7 | 76 | 83 | xxyyx |
| 161,320 | 15 | 68 | 83 | xxy3x |
| 169,285 | 31 | 52 | 83 | xxy4x |
| 179,074 | 63 | 20 | 83 | xxy5x |
| 183,206 | 3 | 86 | 89 | xyxx |
| 652,381 | 15 | 117 | 132 | xyxxyxyx3 |
| 1,548,877 | 7 | 168 | 175 | x7yx5yx3 |
| 3,362,856 | 1 | 234 | 235 | x10|yxy3xy3x |
| 5,981,623 | 15 | 268 | 283 | x15yxxyxyxx |
| 10,190,503 | 15 | 338 | 353 | x9y3x3 |
| 15,458,215 | 7 | 402 | 409 | x9yyx4 |
| 23,255,231 | 3 | 464 | 467 | xyx4|xxy6x |
| 31,983,199 | 3 | 523 | 526 | xyxx |
| 44,015,793 | 31 | 530 | 561 | x10yx7yx3yxyxx |
| 57,048,684 | 7 | 621 | 628 | x4yx9yxx |
| 72,950,781 | 31 | 664 | 695 | x5y3xxyxx |
| 94,407,756 | 63 | 692 | 755 | x5yx5y4x3 |
| 115,883,902 | 7 | 790 | 797 | x3yx16yxx|xy5x |
| 144,738,515 | 31 | 850 | 881 | x6yx4yxyyx4 |
| 174,956,965 | 3 | 956 | 959 | xyx5 |
| 213,616,166 | 31 | 989 | 1,020 | xy4xx |
| 254,305,555 | 255 | 806 | 1,061 | xxyyxyxxyxyx3yyx3 |
| 300,757,874 | 63 | 1,064 | 1,127 | yxxyxxyx3yyxx |
| 348,426,178 | 15 | 1,158 | 1,173 | x12yx7yyxx |
| 401,395,498 | 31 | 1,212 | 1,243 | xyx4yxxyxyxx |
| 466,240,457 | 15 | 1,303 | 1,318 | xxyyxyxx |
| 531,172,100 | 15 | 1,359 | 1,374 | x5yx4yx3yxx |
| 610,675,498 | 31 | 1,417 | 1,448 | x4yxxyxyx4yxx |
| 690,166,371 | 127 | 1,380 | 1,507 | x8y6x3 |
| 784,529,510 | 31 | 1,540 | 1,571 | xxyx14yyxyx3 |
| 877,484,799 | 31 | 1,588 | 1,619 | x10yx17yx3yyx5 |
| 991,186,624 | 127 | 1,590 | 1,717 | x3yyx3y4x4 |
| 992,752,469 | 255 | 1,462 | 1,717 | x3yyx3y4x3yx |
| 995,490,946 | 511 | 1,206 | 1,717 | x3yyx3y4x3yyx |
| 999,395,039 | 1,023 | 694 | 1,717 | x3yyx3y4x3y3x |
alast 1,023nlast 694L=a+nlast 1,717W (x=110, y=111, |=00)last x3yyx3y4x3y3xTemplate comparisonIndBECv1.v Others: partly applies · the nearest solved proof, what carries over, and the transitions that differ
| 0 | 1 | |
|---|---|---|
| A | 1RB | 1RF |
| B | 1LC | 1RE |
| C | --- | 0LD |
| D | 1LE | 0LD |
| E | 1RA | 0RF |
| F | 0RE | 0LB |
differs from the template
- file
IndBECv1.v:576- module
Others (nonhalt7)- machine
1LB1LF_1RC1LB_---0RD_1RE0RD_1LA0LF_0LE0RB(11 transitions apart)- diff
1 transition up to mirror: B1 = 1RE (ours) vs 1RB (template)- note
- Its config_BEC ex-rule (r 1 B> 1^n 0 l -> r <D 0^(n+1) 1 l) holds 24/24 on it, 2/24 on ours (n=0 only). Method fits (binary inc), certificate doesn't; BECv7 TM1 shape also fits.
Proof strategy & riskshow the formal proof will go · 3 risks to watch
Rules on G(a,n,Q): T by ind over trips with a binary-inc side lemma on Q (3-cell digits); reset lemmas split on n in {1,2} and Q's low digits; nonhalt via progress_nonhalt_cond with 'Q in a regular language'. Cheap first try: IndBECv1 solve_hlin_nonhalt on the mirrored TM with config_BEC/config_BEC_Pos, block 3, d1=[1;0;0]; fallback BECv7 TM1 Longitudinal/tail style.
- ▲Q carries a growing low-digit stack (13 to 27 blocks by 1e9); need a closed regular language for it
- ▲Reset branches on Q's low digits: natural dL=1 if L even (98/98), 2-25 if L odd; all branches must be safe
- ▲Template certificate does not transfer; decider may need new ex-rule params or fail
Stats & provenance109 steps simulated · 5,210 cells · the status in full · files
- simulated
- 109 steps
- tape
- 5,210 cells · 2,940 nonzeros
- growth
- L=a+n: 83 at 1.8e5, 1717 at 1e9 (~t^0.35); ~276 phases by 1e9
- status now
- Deepen 2: re-alignment transient solved exactly (PROC rule, 11,500/11,500), and the phase-level closed-form orbit (exact against the trip-level orbit at 4,871/4,871 resets to 2.4e7 trips) runs to L = 6.9e7 with no race lost. Non-halting reduces to an arithmetic race: the invariant W <= bitlen(L)-1 wins it but breaks after rare overflow phases near L ~ 2^k, and the aftermath depends on history-built widths and bits (pseudo-random). Closest race missed by 0.9998 bits at L' = 2^22 - 692. Stop or continue? (Route: overflow-aftermath lemma, see notes.md Deepen pass 2.) (status.json, 2026-10-10)
- observer's note
- Mechanism found and core rules validated; not a cryptid: values grow polynomially and every probed reset branch is safe
- files
- observe.json · notes.md · status.json
Proof & checks
No proof work yet.
Files
machines/<tm>/: 6 entries · raw notes, status, scripts, images
| name | size | changed |
|---|---|---|
| notes.md ↓ | 19 KB | 2026-10-10 06:29 |
| status.json ↓ | 718 B | 2026-10-10 06:28 |
| observe.json ↓ | 12 KB | 2026-10-10 04:41 |
| deepen.json ↓ | 7.8 KB | 2026-10-10 06:29 |
| img/ | 14 items | 2026-10-10 01:54 |
| scripts/ | 15 items | 2026-10-10 06:25 |
status.json in full
{
"tm": "1RB1RF_1LC1RE_---0LD_1LE0LD_1RA0RF_0RE0LB",
"status": "CRYPTID_CANDIDATE",
"stage": "deepen2",
"updated": "2026-10-10",
"reason": "Deepen 2: re-alignment transient solved exactly (PROC rule, 11,500/11,500), and the phase-level closed-form orbit (exact against the trip-level orbit at 4,871/4,871 resets to 2.4e7 trips) runs to L = 6.9e7 with no race lost. Non-halting reduces to an arithmetic race: the invariant W <= bitlen(L)-1 wins it but breaks after rare overflow phases near L ~ 2^k, and the aftermath depends on history-built widths and bits (pseudo-random). Closest race missed by 0.9998 bits at L' = 2^22 - 692. Stop or continue? (Route: overflow-aftermath lemma, see notes.md Deepen pass 2.)"
}



