tools/rebuild_pages.sh rebuilds the site within 5 minutes of a change; by hand: python3 -B tools/site.py.1RB0LC_0RC0RB_1LD0RE_0LE0LF_1LA0LB_1RA---
Where it stands
Skipped
Twin port refuted. In TM1's digit representation D1 fires in exactly 3 RInc cases; there 64f writes the word 0011001 where TM1 writes 0000101 (2 steps fewer).
Read the full status
The exact 64f map RIncF (44 obligations, symbolically derived) differs from RInc only there plus a Tp3 return. A direct re-read heals the defect (+12 steps), but a neighbour read by D0011 0 does not: TM1 makes D0011_000101 -> ... -> D0011101 (a new exit), 64f makes D0011_011001 -> ... -> D00101001 (carries on). Exits 1-6 coincide (Inc 109 ... 528,713); the orbits split at Inc 529,337 (374,704 cells differ); TM1's exit 7 (Inc 529,462) has no 64f counterpart; TM1 reaches upstream's S' at Inc 1,333,817, 64f does not (11 exits by Inc 1e8, counter-like regime, no inr). Critical Inc steps re-run on the list strings.

About this picture
The standard picture (bbchallenge.org's Default view): each row is the whole tape at one step, time runs downward, and the head's path draws the pattern.
Overview
In one sentence
flip(64) = 1LB0RC_0LC0LB_1RD0LE_0RE0RF_1RA0RB_1LA--- = TM1 with D1 0RF (vs 1RF) and F0 1LA (vs 1RA); same states, same start A; init to x0 identical (1699 steps, D1-free) (status.json relation)
- Status
- Skippedtwin port refuted · updated 2026-10-14Parked · Twin port refuted.idle since Oct 14 16:13 (45 h ago) · status.json 2026-10-14
- Class
- Skelet 1-like Class 1
- On the list
- line 59 of
BB6_holdouts_663.txt· historical 740 line 64
Your calls on file 1
- next
- No port. Back to the K42 pool (strategy direction 2). Asset for the K42 atlas: RIncF, an exact case-by-case accelerator in Sk1like_TC_v1's representation (Coq: copy RD/RC/RInc/Inc, change 3 exit branches, add Tp3 and its 2 callers; untested in coqc). A kill needs an invariant on RIncF's counter regime.
Mechanism
Proof & checks
No proof work yet.
Files
machines/<tm>/: 6 entries · raw notes, status, scripts, images
| name | size | changed |
|---|---|---|
| notes.md ↓ | 7.7 KB | 2026-10-14 16:13 |
| status.json ↓ | 2.1 KB | 2026-10-14 16:13 |
| logs/ | 2 items | 2026-10-14 16:13 |
| check_twin.py ↓ | 17 KB | 2026-10-14 16:11 |
| orbit_long.py ↓ | 1.1 KB | 2026-10-14 16:13 |
| symexec.py ↓ | 27 KB | 2026-10-14 16:08 |
status.json in full
{
"tm": "1RB0LC_0RC0RB_1LD0RE_0LE0LF_1LA0LB_1RA---",
"label": "P-64",
"status": "SKIPPED",
"stage": "twin_port_refuted",
"updated": "2026-10-14",
"confidence": "high",
"holdout_line_740": 64,
"class": "Skelet 1-like Class 1 (K42 core)",
"parent": "Sk1like_TC_v1.v Module TM1 (1LB0RC_0LC0LB_1RD0LE_0RE1RF_1RA0RB_1RA---), nonhalt",
"relation": "flip(64) = 1LB0RC_0LC0LB_1RD0LE_0RE0RF_1RA0RB_1LA--- = TM1 with D1 0RF (vs 1RF) and F0 1LA (vs 1RA); same states, same start A; init to x0 identical (1699 steps, D1-free)",
"reason": "Twin port refuted. In TM1's digit representation D1 fires in exactly 3 RInc cases; there 64f writes the word 0011001 where TM1 writes 0000101 (2 steps fewer). The exact 64f map RIncF (44 obligations, symbolically derived) differs from RInc only there plus a Tp3 return. A direct re-read heals the defect (+12 steps), but a neighbour read by D0011 0 does not: TM1 makes D0011_000101 -> ... -> D0011101 (a new exit), 64f makes D0011_011001 -> ... -> D00101001 (carries on). Exits 1-6 coincide (Inc 109 ... 528,713); the orbits split at Inc 529,337 (374,704 cells differ); TM1's exit 7 (Inc 529,462) has no 64f counterpart; TM1 reaches upstream's S' at Inc 1,333,817, 64f does not (11 exits by Inc 1e8, counter-like regime, no inr). Critical Inc steps re-run on the list strings.",
"checks": {
"check_twin": "check_twin.py SUMMARY PASS (17 checks, ~20 s; logs/check_twin_full.log)",
"orbit_1e8": "logs/rincf_orbit_1e8.log (orbit_long.py twin 1e8)"
},
"siblings": [
"1RB0LC_0RC0RF_1RD0RE_1LE0RA_0LA0LE_1LD---"
],
"sibling_note": "740 line 124 (P-124) is the same table started in TM1-state C (TM3's renaming); against TM3 it splits at Inc 529,352 the same way (check_twin.py T). Line 305 is the third start of this table per reports/strategy/equivalence-candidates.tsv.",
"next": "No port. Back to the K42 pool (strategy direction 2). Asset for the K42 atlas: RIncF, an exact case-by-case accelerator in Sk1like_TC_v1's representation (Coq: copy RD/RC/RInc/Inc, change 3 exit branches, add Tp3 and its 2 callers; untested in coqc). A kill needs an invariant on RIncF's counter regime."
}