tools/rebuild_pages.sh rebuilds the site within 5 minutes of a change; by hand: python3 -B tools/site.py.1RB0LD_0RC1RA_1RD1RF_1LA0LE_0RA0LC_0RA---
Where it stands
Parked at the deeper analysis
Parked 2026-10-11 (Dennis: go with recommendations): Keep parked. Parked by the stop rule of the funded 'induct' stage (2026-10-10): the left zone is not shown stable or growing.
Read the full status
Done: a left window map Phi (the left part changes only at arrivals, and the next reset is fixed by the window itself), validated on the real gen-1 to gen-2 step (6/6 runs reproduce the 12 real left-zone events exactly); reset 2 with exact near runs has no nested event; x2 run growth follows from counter arithmetic (real gap ratios 2 +- 0.01). Open: over generations 2-6 the left zone is safe where tested (predicted gen-3/4 zones: 0/80 nested events each) but jumps in size (raw prefix 50, 168, 96, 128, 212 cells), possibly a 2-cycle (g vs g-2 agree on 53, 91, 99 cells), so no invariant for all generations. Reopen by iterating Phi further (cheap) to test the 2-cycle.

About this picture
The standard picture (bbchallenge.org's Default view): each row is the whole tape at one step, time runs downward, and the head's path draws the pattern.
Overview
In one sentence
Bouncer on 11111010 with 4-state digit blocks (base-4 carry); 1 reset at 3e7 left static walls; no halt to 2e10
- Status
- Parkedinduct parked · updated 2026-10-11Not blocking · Stuck at the induct parked stage. Answer Q1–Q3 whenever; a “no” redirects the work.idle since Oct 11 08:19 · status.json 2026-10-11
- Class
- Shift-overflow structural counterours: sheet Shift-overflow structural counter ≠ ours Shift-overflow counter: base-4 digit blocks in a bouncer, plus a one-time reset that leaves walls · med confidence
- On the list
- line 569 of
BB6_holdouts_663.txt· historical 740 line 633
Your calls on file 6
- parked
- Parked 2026-10-11 (Dennis: go with recommendations): Keep parked.
- funded
- option: induct · date: 2026-10-10 · auto: true
- 2026-10-10 · induct
- Fund one stage on #9's generation induction (show every reset body grows at most x2 per marker and keeps a large enough left zone), or park the machine? (auto-applied: Claude's recommendation, under Dennis's standing instruction 'do your recommendations and continuously orchestrate' (2026-10-10, while he was away). Override any time.)
- 2026-10-10 · left_zone
- Fund one more deepen stage on #9's left zone (parametric rules for zero-length runs, plus validated marker episodes), aiming to reach high confidence and go on to proof.md? (Dennis: go with all recommendations (2026-10-10))
- 2026-10-10 · reset
- Fund one more stage on #9's reset (front rule at the Q-territory edge, randomised marker episodes, the inner-counter capacity bound), aiming at high confidence and proof.md? (auto-applied: Claude's recommendation, under Dennis's standing instruction 'do your recommendations and continuously orchestrate' (2026-10-10, while he was at lunch). Override any time.)
- decision.json · answered 2026-10-11: park
- Keep #9 parked, as the stop rule says, or fund one stage to test whether its left zone settles into a 2-cycle across generations? Decisions →
Mechanism
How it works: 3 notes
- Tape: runs of P=11111010 split by 6-cell digit blocks D0-D3; the head sweeps from the right edge to the first D0/D1.
- Each sweep steps every visited digit D0>D1>D2>D3>D0 (base-4 carry); D3>D0 moves one P across, so runs double leftward.
- At 2.97e7 the carry hit the left end: an 8e6-step rebuild left static walls X=11; digits cross them unchanged (to 2e10).
Figures for Checkpoint A
Time runs down; step 3e7 is about 30% of the way down. Look along both edges for any break.
One row per 2nd sweep; colour shows how the 8-cell word is shifted. Watch the top half's colour edges.
The left quarter after the reset, to 1e9. Look where the slanted lines meet the vertical ones.
More figures (2)Fig 4–5: The reset, Blaze view · Left/right records to 9.47M steps
8.1M steps from step 29,754,243: the inner bouncer regrows from the left.
Before the reset: digit boundaries are straight lines.
Rules (8/8 validated)exact tape rewrites the proof will formalize, each re-checked by simulation
| rule | from ⟶ to | cases | steps | checked |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| edge | l P^n A ⟶ l' P^n B | l P^n B --> l' P^(n+1) A | every sweep; tail alternates A/B, edge +4 cells | — | ✓120/120 |
| turn@D0 | l D0 P^a A ⟶ l D1 P^a B (from B: l D1 P^(a+1) A) | head turns at D0; l untouched | 38a+22 (A) / 38a+30 (B) | ✓61/61 |
| turn@D1 | l D1 P^a A ⟶ l D2 P^a B (from B: l D2 P^(a+1) A) | head turns at D1; l untouched | 38a+20 (A) / 38a+28 (B) | ✓59/59 |
| carry@D2 | l D2 P^c R ⟶ l* D3 P^c R' | carry continues into l (l* = l after its own visit) | +38c+14 on top of the turn | ✓69/69 |
| carry@D3 | l D3 P^c R ⟶ l* P D0 P^(c-1) R' | c>=1; one P moves left across the digit | +38c+36 on top of the turn | ✓71/71 |
| wall pass | l X P^c R ⟶ l* X P^c R' | X=11 (phase +2 wall) is transparent to the carry | — | ✓24/24 |
| D1 meets wall | l D1 X P^c R ⟶ l* X P D0 P^(c-1) R' | empty run between D1 and X; carry continues | — | ✓24/24 |
| full-sweep model (real orbit) | E(T; n_i, b_i) at a right-edge D record ⟶ next D record = rules above applied once | gen 1 at 1e7 (297 sweeps) + gen 2 at 1e9 (596); D-X adjacency sweeps excluded | — | ✓893/893 |
Compressed historythe tape as 0∞ L .. b3 P^n3 b2 P^n2 b1 P^n1 b0 P^n0 T D> 0∞ ; P=11111010, D0=111010 D1=101111 D2=101011 D3=111111 X=11; T=A: last P ends under head (..1111101 D> 0∞), T=B: P^n0 101 D> 0∞ at 30 moments: where the rules are read off
| step | T | n0 | b0 | n1 | b1 | n2 | b2 | n3 | b3 | #D | #X |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10,009,637 | B | 314 | D3 | 155 | D0 | 79 | D3 | 39 | D1 | 12 | 5 |
| 10,027,525 | A | 314 | D0 | 156 | D1 | 79 | D3 | 39 | D1 | 12 | 5 |
| 10,039,479 | B | 314 | D1 | 156 | D1 | 79 | D3 | 39 | D1 | 12 | 5 |
| 10,051,439 | A | 315 | D2 | 156 | D1 | 79 | D3 | 39 | D1 | 12 | 5 |
| 10,069,371 | B | 315 | D3 | 156 | D2 | 79 | D3 | 39 | D1 | 12 | 5 |
| 10,091,867 | A | 315 | D0 | 157 | D3 | 78 | D0 | 40 | D2 | 12 | 5 |
| 10,103,859 | B | 315 | D1 | 157 | D3 | 78 | D0 | 40 | D2 | 12 | 5 |
| 10,115,857 | A | 316 | D2 | 157 | D3 | 78 | D0 | 40 | D2 | 12 | 5 |
| 10,136,867 | B | 316 | D3 | 156 | D0 | 79 | D1 | 40 | D2 | 12 | 5 |
| 10,154,869 | A | 316 | D0 | 157 | D1 | 79 | D1 | 40 | D2 | 12 | 5 |
| 10,166,899 | B | 316 | D1 | 157 | D1 | 79 | D1 | 40 | D2 | 12 | 5 |
| 10,178,935 | A | 317 | D2 | 157 | D1 | 79 | D1 | 40 | D2 | 12 | 5 |
| 10,196,981 | B | 317 | D3 | 157 | D2 | 79 | D1 | 40 | D2 | 12 | 5 |
| 10,218,073 | A | 317 | D0 | 158 | D3 | 79 | D2 | 40 | D2 | 12 | 5 |
| 10,230,141 | B | 317 | D1 | 158 | D3 | 79 | D2 | 40 | D2 | 12 | 5 |
| 10,242,215 | A | 318 | D2 | 158 | D3 | 79 | D2 | 40 | D2 | 12 | 5 |
| 10,266,327 | B | 318 | D3 | 157 | D0 | 80 | D3 | 40 | D3 | 12 | 5 |
| 10,284,443 | A | 318 | D0 | 158 | D1 | 80 | D3 | 40 | D3 | 12 | 5 |
| 10,296,549 | B | 318 | D1 | 158 | D1 | 80 | D3 | 40 | D3 | 12 | 5 |
| 10,308,661 | A | 319 | D2 | 158 | D1 | 80 | D3 | 40 | D3 | 12 | 5 |
| 10,326,821 | B | 319 | D3 | 158 | D2 | 80 | D3 | 40 | D3 | 12 | 5 |
| 10,350,381 | A | 319 | D0 | 159 | D3 | 79 | D0 | 40 | D0 | 12 | 5 |
| 10,362,525 | B | 319 | D1 | 159 | D3 | 79 | D0 | 40 | D0 | 12 | 5 |
| 10,374,675 | A | 320 | D2 | 159 | D3 | 79 | D0 | 40 | D0 | 12 | 5 |
| 40,005,946 | A | 56 | X | 378 | D3 | 81 | D3 | 82 | X | 20 | 11 |
| 100,058,178 | B | 892 | D0 | 83 | X | 229 | D3 | 312 | X | 20 | 11 |
| 400,090,666 | B | 1,948 | D0 | 839 | D1 | 300 | X | 322 | D3 | 20 | 11 |
| 1,600,152,606 | A | 3,965 | D3 | 1,846 | D0 | 1,125 | D1 | 183 | X | 20 | 11 |
| 6,400,057,808 | B | 7,952 | D2 | 3,841 | D3 | 2,121 | D0 | 994 | D2 | 20 | 11 |
| 20,000,291,798 | A | 14,060 | D1 | 6,895 | D3 | 3,648 | D0 | 1,757 | D0 | 20 | 11 |
Tlast An0last 14,060b0last D1n1last 6,895b1last D3n2last 3,648b2last D0n3last 1,757b3last D0#Dlast 20#Xlast 11Template comparisonSBCv6a.v TM1: partly applies · the nearest solved proof, what carries over, and the transitions that differ
| 0 | 1 | |
|---|---|---|
| A | 1RB | 0LD |
| B | 0RC | 1RA |
| C | 1RD | 1RF |
| D | 1LA | 0LE |
| E | 0RA | 0LC |
| F | 0RA | --- |
- file
SBCv6a.v:15- module
TM1- machine
1LB1RE_0LC0RB_1RD0LA_0RA0RD_0RF0RA_1RD---(10 transitions apart)- diff
9/12 transitions differ after best renaming+mirror; SBCv10 TM4/TM5, SOBLv1 TM2, Bouncer_v1 TM1: 8; look-alike Bouncer_v1 TM2: 10- note
- No proved neighbour is within 8 transitions, and its blocks (10011001) never appear here. Only the method transfers: Longitudinal segRLs/sideRLs passes, plus RIncs/WF over a digit list, fit gen 1; nothing covers the reset.
Proof strategy & riskshow the formal proof will go · 3 risks to watch
Mirror SBCv6a TM1 (Longitudinal, flip tm): pass lemmas for P^n, D0-D3, X, D1.X via es/ind; BigStep over an Inductive digit list with a WF invariant; multistep_nonhalt to a post-reset config, then progress_nonhalt_cond. First close the block alphabet (D2.X, X.D1 transients; left-prefix overflow).
- ▲Reset not modelled: if the left overflow recurs (after 2e10, beyond our sim), each rebuild may nest new walls, so the proof needs a generation invariant.
- ▲Rule table not closed: D2.X and X.D1 adjacency create extra transient blocks ((10)^5 1^3 ..).
- ▲No template within 8 transitions: new-mechanism proof, likely SBCv10-sized (~50 KB).
Stats & provenance2·1010 steps simulated · 227,260 cells · the status in full · files
- simulated
- 2·1010 steps
- tape
- 227,260 cells · 146,198 nonzeros
- growth
- ~1.61*sqrt(t) cells (+4 cells per sweep); 56,806 sweeps by 2e10
- status now
- Parked 2026-10-11 (Dennis: go with recommendations): Keep parked. Parked by the stop rule of the funded 'induct' stage (2026-10-10): the left zone is not shown stable or growing. Done: a left window map Phi (the left part changes only at arrivals, and the next reset is fixed by the window itself), validated on the real gen-1 to gen-2 step (6/6 runs reproduce the 12 real left-zone events exactly); reset 2 with exact near runs has no nested event; x2 run growth follows from counter arithmetic (real gap ratios 2 +- 0.01). Open: over generations 2-6 the left zone is safe where tested (predicted gen-3/4 zones: 0/80 nested events each) but jumps in size (raw prefix 50, 168, 96, 128, 212 cells), possibly a 2-cycle (g vs g-2 agree on 53, 91, 99 cells), so no invariant for all generations. Reopen by iterating Phi further (cheap) to test the 2-cycle. (status.json, 2026-10-11)
- observer's note
- Counter rules validated (8 rules, random + 893 real sweeps); no Collatz-like arithmetic; reset and D-X transients still open
- files
- observe.json · notes.md · status.json
Proof & checks
○ Checkpoint B: no note from Dennis found
- notes.md L60: - Checkpoint questions are now yes/no questions about the figures. Moved off the card (strategy calls, not figure reading; settle them in proof.md / Checkpoint B):
Files
machines/<tm>/: 8 entries · raw notes, status, scripts, images
| name | size | changed |
|---|---|---|
| notes.md ↓ | 33 KB | 2026-10-11 08:19 |
| status.json ↓ | 1.1 KB | 2026-10-11 08:19 |
| observe.json ↓ | 15 KB | 2026-10-10 04:41 |
| deepen.json ↓ | 21 KB | 2026-10-10 15:18 |
| decision.json ↓ | 2.3 KB | 2026-10-11 08:19 |
| decisions/ | 3 items | 2026-10-10 15:17 |
| img/ | 9 items | 2026-10-10 02:00 |
| scripts/ | 36 items | 2026-10-10 14:56 |
status.json in full
{
"tm": "1RB0LD_0RC1RA_1RD1RF_1LA0LE_0RA0LC_0RA---",
"status": "STUCK",
"stage": "induct_parked",
"updated": "2026-10-11",
"reason": "Parked 2026-10-11 (Dennis: go with recommendations): Keep parked. Parked by the stop rule of the funded 'induct' stage (2026-10-10): the left zone is not shown stable or growing. Done: a left window map Phi (the left part changes only at arrivals, and the next reset is fixed by the window itself), validated on the real gen-1 to gen-2 step (6/6 runs reproduce the 12 real left-zone events exactly); reset 2 with exact near runs has no nested event; x2 run growth follows from counter arithmetic (real gap ratios 2 +- 0.01). Open: over generations 2-6 the left zone is safe where tested (predicted gen-3/4 zones: 0/80 nested events each) but jumps in size (raw prefix 50, 168, 96, 128, 212 cells), possibly a 2-cycle (g vs g-2 agree on 53, 91, 99 cells), so no invariant for all generations. Reopen by iterating Phi further (cheap) to test the 2-cycle.",
"funded": {
"option": "induct",
"date": "2026-10-10",
"auto": true
},
"confidence": "med",
"parked": "Parked 2026-10-11 (Dennis: go with recommendations): Keep parked."
}



