BB(6) hunt
Machines / W6-5

1RB0LB_0LC0RE_1LA1LD_0LB1LD_1RA0RF_1RA---

W6-5Claimed elsewhereChaotic Bell Class 4bbchallenge ↗Explorer

Upstream result

Claimed elsewhere

The blank-start machine halts: PR_ChaoticBell4.v.TM2 ↗.

Absent from the current 663 holdout list. Earlier local observations remain below.

space-time diagram, first 10,000 steps from blank
The first 10,000 steps from a blank tape. Time runs down; white is 1.
About this picture

The standard picture (bbchallenge.org's Default view): each row is the whole tape at one step, time runs downward, and the head's path draws the pattern.

bbchallenge-defaultStart blankRows steps 0 → 10,000, top to bottomWindow cells −200..199, left to rightColors 1 0 or unvisited

Overview

In one sentence

Phases convert one budget block per 4-trip cycle; each new layer is ~4/3 the last and n mod 3 picks the next phase.

Upstream
The blank-start machine halts: PR_ChaoticBell4.v.TM2 ↗.
Status
Externally Solvedobserving · updated 2026-10-14Parked · Observe done (about 2 h). The 3 open questions are optional.
idle since Oct 14 16:43 (44 h ago) · status.json 2026-10-14
Class
Chaotic Bell Class 4ours: sheet Chaotic Bell Class 4 ≠ ours Layered Bell counter: budget phases with a x4/3, mod-3-branching layer law (cryptid-like) · med confidence
On the list
not on BB6_holdouts_663.txt (line 333 of the previous list) · historical 740 line 333 · observe.json rank #333
eqv ×6sim 1e14
Your calls on file 3
priority call (answered)
Cryptid-like (pre-registered stop): the layer law is x4/3 and n mod 3 picks the next phase; no halting branch is known. Park it, or fund one 2 h stage for an exact phase-level accelerator (R1-R3 plus measured phase-end maps) and a census of the residue branches?
parked
Dennis 2026-10-14: park
2026-10-14 · park
W6-5's layer law is x4/3 with n mod 3 picking the next phase (the pre-registered stop): park it, or fund one 2 h stage?

Mechanism

How it works: 3 notes
  • Trip and phase level: three short trips cross the unary counter 1001^c, the fourth converts one budget block; the budget sum is conserved and c grows by 2 per cycle (R1-R3 validated 60/60, 40/40, 40/40).
  • Epoch level: at a phase end the counter (about 8n cells) becomes a layer of (4n+r)/3 blocks, and n mod 3 picks the next phase (0: H6 shift phase, 1: R1 phase at once, 2: re-eat an older layer).
  • To 1e11: layers 5803, 9996, 13333, 17774; the old 9996 layer is re-eaten at 4.8e10..8e10 and rebuilt; no halt (halting needs B> 111, never written).

Figures for Checkpoint A

Fig 1 · One cycle of rule R1Q1

Count the trips from the right edge: three turn near the counter, the fourth crawls left through 100001 blocks.

One cycle of rule R1
bbchallenge-defaultStart constructed: 0∞ 1011 (110010)5 12 04 1101 (100001)10 (1001)12 A> 0∞Rows every step, steps 0..1030Window cells -152..9, 1 px = 1 cellColors 1 0 head moving R/L
Rows: one cycle ends at step 1026
Fig 2 · Phases from blank to 6.6e9Q2

Each slanted boundary is a budget being eaten; each new band is a layer left by a phase end.

Phases from blank to 6.6e9
bbchallenge-defaultStart blankRows every 10,000,000 stepsWindow cells -17..156,908, 1 px = 128 cellsColors 1 0 head moving R/L
Rows: to step 6,640,000,000 (665 rows; stopped by the cell cap) · Window: sampled, so periodic words show as textures
More figures (2)Fig 3–4: Default view, first 10,000 steps · Records to 2 million steps
Fig 3 · Default view, first 10,000 steps

The site's own picture: a growing triangle of striped regions, head sweeping to the right end.

Default view, first 10,000 steps
bbchallenge-defaultStart blankRows every step; 10,000 steps squeezed into 500 rowsWindow cells -200..199, 1 px = 1 cellColors 1 0 head moving R/L
Rows: site canvas
Fig 4 · Records to 2 million steps

One row per new record; the grey right band is the counter, diagonals are budget boundaries.

Records to 2 million steps
bbchallenge-defaultStart blankRows left/right records to step 2,000,000Window cells -17..2572, 1 px = 1 cellColors 1 0 head moving R/L
Rows: 2,590 rows
Rules (4/4 validated)exact tape rewrites the proof will formalize, each re-checked by simulation
rulefrom ⟶ tocasesstepschecked
R1 (K6 eats H6)
0∞ 1011 (110010)a 12 04 1101 (100001)b+2 (1001)c A> 0∞
⟶ 0∞ 1011 (110010)a+1 12 04 1101 (100001)b+1 (1001)c+2 A> 0∞
b+2 >= 2 (the last block, b+1 = 1, is the phase end)—✓60/60
R2 (1e8 hub)
0∞ (1011)3 (001011)a 04 (110)2 (000110)b+2 (01)2 1 04 (110010)p+1 (110000)q+3 13 01 (1001)c A> 0∞
⟶ 0∞ (1011)3 (001011)a+1 04 (110)2 (000110)b+1 (01)2 1 04 (110010)p+1 (110000)q+3 13 01 (1001)c+2 A> 0∞
b+2 >= 2—✓40/40
R3 (5e8 hub, Y^2 -> X)
0∞ (110)3 X^a (010110)2 (000110)3 110 Y^(b+3) (000110)p+1 (01)2 (100001)q+1 (1001)c A> 0∞
⟶ 0∞ (110)3 X^(a+1) (010110)2 (000110)3 110 Y^(b+1) (000110)p+1 (01)2 (100001)q+1 (1001)c+2 A> 0∞
X = 010110010110000110000110, Y = 010110000110; b+3 >= 3—✓40/40
E (phase end, budget n)
phase 6 with budget n = g+h (real 1.29e10 configuration, h varied)
⟶ new layer of (4n+r)/3 blocks; n = 0 mod 3: H6->H6 shift phase; 1 mod 3: R1 phase at once; 2 mod 3: re-eats the older 5803 layer
n mod 3 (r = 7 for residue 2, 5 for residue 1 at the measured snapshot)—✓6/6
Compressed historythe tape as phase 6 at the A record: 0∞ L (110)2 03 (110010)g 12 04 1101 (100001)h (1001)c A> 0∞ at 3 moments: where the rules are read off
phase 6 at the A record: 0∞ L (110)2 03 (110010)g 12 04 1101 (100001)h (1001)c A> 0∞
stepghc
12,500,084,1309,14485318,290
12,700,067,0969,45953718,921
12,900,059,3489,77322319,549
glast 9,773
9,7739,1441.3e101.3e10step 12500084130: g = 9144step 12700067096: g = 9459step 12900059348: g = 9773
hlast 223
8532231.3e101.3e10step 12500084130: h = 853step 12700067096: h = 537step 12900059348: h = 223
clast 19,549
19,54918,2901.3e101.3e10step 12500084130: c = 18290step 12700067096: c = 18921step 12900059348: c = 19549
Template comparisonW5-3: partly applies · the nearest solved proof, what carries over, and the transitions that differ
01
A1RB0LB
B0LC0RE
C1LA1LD
D0LB1LD
E1RA0RF
F1RA---
file
—
module
W5-3 (our kill)
machine
1RB1RA_1LC1LE_1RF1LD_1RE0LD_0LB0RA_---0RC (10 transitions apart)
diff
no table within 5 transitions; architecture comparison only
note
Our W5-3 kill (machines/<W5-3>/ .v, read). R1-R3 are linear walk lemmas like W5-3's Wk/W2Q. W5-3 closes its eats with a binary counter and one size bound; here the phase ends feed a x4/3 layer law with a mod-3 branch, which no template covers.
Proof strategy & riskshow the formal proof will go · 3 risks to watch

Parked under the cryptid protocol. If funded: build an exact phase-level accelerator from R1-R3 plus measured phase-end maps, run it far past 1e11, and census the residue branches for a closed set of phase shapes.

  • ▲The layer law n -> (4n+r)/3 with a mod-3 choice of successor phase is Collatz-like (Hydra-style x3/2 relatives); a closed invariant may not exist.
  • ▲Phase ends were measured on 6 instances from one real configuration only; other phase types may have other offsets.
  • ▲Phases reach back into older layers (9996 re-eaten at 4.8e10), so the state is a stack of layers, not one counter.
Stats & provenance1011 steps simulated · 601,752 cells · the status in full · files
simulated
1011 steps
tape
601,752 cells
growth
span about 1.9-2.0 x sqrt(steps): 19k at 1e8, 58k at 1e9, 204k at 1e10, 602k at 1e11
status now
Observe done (about 2 h). The tape is a stack of layers of periodic words (110000, 110010, 1100, 110 rotations). The head runs 4-trip cycles: three short trips over a unary counter 1001^c, one long trip that converts one block of the current budget region; per cycle the budget sum is conserved and c grows by 2 (rules R1-R3 validated 60/60, 40/40, 40/40 from random instances). When a budget n runs out, the counter (about 8n cells) becomes a new layer of (4n+r)/3 six-cell blocks, and n mod 3 selects one of three successor phases (measured on n = 9996..10001 from the real 1.29e10 configuration: residue 0 -> H6 shift phase, 1 -> R1 phase at once, 2 -> re-eat the older 5803 layer). That is the pre-registered W6-5 stop rule (x m/k law with a residue split), so the cryptid protocol applies: rules formalized in observe.json, flagged, stopped. Direct run to 1e11: no halt, span 601,752; layers 5803, 9996, 13333, 17774; the old 9996 layer was re-eaten at 4.8e10..8e10 and rebuilt. Halting needs B> 111, never seen. (status.json, 2026-10-14)
observer's note
Pre-registered W6-5 stop rule met: the epoch law is x4/3 with a mod-3 residue split (three successor phases, one re-eats older layers). R1-R3 validated; phase ends measured on 6 instances. No halt to 1e11.
files
observe.json · notes.md · status.json

Proof & checks

No proof work yet.

Files

machines/<tm>/: 7 entries · raw notes, status, scripts, images

namesizechanged
notes.md ↓6.7 KB2026-10-14 14:25
status.json ↓2.1 KB2026-10-14 16:43
observe.json ↓7.7 KB2026-10-14 14:26
decisions/1 item2026-10-14 16:43
img/4 items2026-10-14 14:24
scripts/6 items2026-10-14 14:24
work/7 items2026-10-14 14:24
status.json in full
{
 "tm": "1RB0LB_0LC0RE_1LA1LD_0LB1LD_1RA0RF_1RA---",
 "label": "W6-5",
 "status": "CRYPTID_CANDIDATE",
 "stage": "observe",
 "updated": "2026-10-14",
 "confidence": "med",
 "holdout_line_740": 333,
 "reason": "Observe done (about 2 h). The tape is a stack of layers of periodic words (110000, 110010, 1100, 110 rotations). The head runs 4-trip cycles: three short trips over a unary counter 1001^c, one long trip that converts one block of the current budget region; per cycle the budget sum is conserved and c grows by 2 (rules R1-R3 validated 60/60, 40/40, 40/40 from random instances). When a budget n runs out, the counter (about 8n cells) becomes a new layer of (4n+r)/3 six-cell blocks, and n mod 3 selects one of three successor phases (measured on n = 9996..10001 from the real 1.29e10 configuration: residue 0 -> H6 shift phase, 1 -> R1 phase at once, 2 -> re-eat the older 5803 layer). That is the pre-registered W6-5 stop rule (x m/k law with a residue split), so the cryptid protocol applies: rules formalized in observe.json, flagged, stopped. Direct run to 1e11: no halt, span 601,752; layers 5803, 9996, 13333, 17774; the old 9996 layer was re-eaten at 4.8e10..8e10 and rebuilt. Halting needs B> 111, never seen.",
 "siblings": [],
 "sibling_note": "No other start or mirror of this table is on the 740/778 lists (canon from all 6 starts). Starts C, E, F are eqv_1590 lines 122, 128, 132 (276's equivalence group). In the critic's family only 479 and 145 share a table (145 = 479 from B); 333, 683 and 276 each have their own table. The time-shifted record-twin claim for 479/683 was not re-checked.",
 "upstream": "No upstream proof; sheet Results row: class only, note 'Possible bouncer'; discarded-machines tab: 'unanalysed'. No Discord hit.",
 "priority_call_answered": "Cryptid-like (pre-registered stop): the layer law is x4/3 and n mod 3 picks the next phase; no halting branch is known. Park it, or fund one 2 h stage for an exact phase-level accelerator (R1-R3 plus measured phase-end maps) and a census of the residue branches?",
 "parked": "Dennis 2026-10-14: park"
}