{
 "tm": "1RB0RF_1RC0RE_1LD1RA_1LA0LD_1RA---_0RA0LB",
 "status": "STUCK",
 "stage": "crossing",
 "updated": "2026-10-11",
 "confidence": "med",
 "cryptid_flag": false,
 "reason": "Parked 2026-10-11 (Dennis: go with recommendations): Park R3 with R2 (stop rule). Funded crossing stage (2026-10-10) ended STUCK by its stop rule (no inductive form found), so R3 parks with R2; confidence stays med. New exact integer model (word = digit value v + multiset M of j depths; matches the token model on 100,000/100,000 epochs from blank) runs 1e7 epochs to N = 1.44e8: every epoch safe. Proved on paper and checked (100,000 trajectory epochs, 59,887 random states): Lemma S, the bell after epoch e is safe whenever zb(Y_e) <= bitlen(N_e) - 1 + s_e (s = eat shift) or s = 0 and Y_e = 2^bitlen(N_e); in particular whenever Y_e < 2^(bitlen N_e + 1). This replaces L*, which fails at 6 epochs to 1e7 (7, 8, 14, 15, 350,273, 350,274; all Y = 2^m exactly). Open: the Big-Y lemma, Y_e >= 2^(bitlen N_e + 1) => zb(Y_e) <= bitlen(N_e) - 1 + s_e. Its hypothesis holds only at epochs 9, 16 and 350,275 to 1e7 (C-margins 3, 3, 15), each right after an exact-power pair; the candidate C0 is not inductive on random near-crossing states. The safety margin is not 2.3 bits: it falls to 1.000 bit at epoch 350,274 (N = 2^22 - 4,693), a structural case covered by Lemma S. Not a cryptid.",
 "funded": {
  "option": "crossing",
  "date": "2026-10-10",
  "auto": true
 },
 "parked": "Parked 2026-10-11 (Dennis: go with recommendations): Park R3 with R2 (stop rule).",
 "priority_call_answered": "R3's cleanup is now exact and safety reduces to one per-epoch inequality (2^P <= N, via L*), the same crossing arithmetic R2 is stuck on: fund one joint crossing-lemma stage, start Rocq on the exact rules, or park?"
}