{
 "tm": "1RB---_1LC1RE_1LD0LC_1LE1LC_1RF0RE_1RA0RB",
 "bucket_reason": "high confidence; proof.md after skeptic round 2 has one major gap left (two zone lemmas)",
 "question": "#14's proof is down to one major gap (lemma VF and the plant step for v > 600): fund one more revision round to close it, or park #14?",
 "options": [
  {
   "id": "vf_round",
   "label": "Close lemma VF (about 2 h)",
   "consequence": "Extend Lemma L to members of different marker height, so each descent step follows from finitely many one-step representatives (the route in proof.md section 9), and make the symbolic plant step a checked lemma. If both close: skeptic round 3, then Rocq. Stop rule: park if VF needs a new engine."
  },
  {
   "id": "park",
   "label": "Park #14",
   "consequence": "No further cost now. proof.md, check_proof.py (quick and full pass) and the open-lemma list stay for reuse."
  }
 ],
 "recommended": "vf_round",
 "rationale": [
  "Round 2 fixed the invariant gap and all four minor gaps; check_proof.py passes in quick and full mode.",
  "Left: lemma VF (value form down to marker height 3, both levels) and the plant step for v > 600, which is executed but not proved.",
  "proof.md section 9 already names the route; not a cryptid."
 ],
 "evidence": [
  {
   "kind": "fact",
   "text": "Open lemmas VF and plant step, with what is proved this round: status.json and proof.md sections 6.3, 6.5, 9",
   "href": "proof.md"
  },
  {
   "kind": "fact",
   "text": "check_proof.py quick + full: ALL PASS (full 5.4 min, Lemma L at R = 16, Inv at 1,201 records)",
   "href": "check_proof.py"
  }
 ],
 "effort_if_yes": "about 2 h of agent time for the lemma round; then skeptic round 3 and a Rocq formalization (several hours)",
 "updated": "2026-10-12",
 "answer": {
  "option": "vf_round",
  "note": "Dennis 2026-10-12: 'go with recommendations'",
  "date": "2026-10-12"
 }
}